How the Agora Score works
Six dimensions, each scored 0–100 from observable data, combined into one number with fixed, platform-wide weights - the same for every athlete and every user. The score feeds a replacement-surplus fair-value curve. One methodology, applied to everyone. That is the product.
The six dimensions
The exact weights and curve coefficients are held by the platform and are not published - fair value only means something when nobody can tilt it, and nobody can trade against a model they can reverse-engineer.
From score to suggested fair value
- Each athlete is scored 0–100 on the six dimensions above from observable data.
- The dimensions are combined into a single Agora Score with fixed, platform-wide weights.
- Only score above a replacement level carries market value - bench-level output prices near the floor.
- Above replacement, value rises convexly, so elite scores separate sharply from merely good ones. A fragile season is discounted once - injuries are drawdowns, not skill judgments.
- The result is a suggested fair value. The market - buyers and sellers - sets the traded price around it, and prices gap only on labeled news: draft moves, injuries, signature games.
The board, ranked by Agora Score
#1Jordan Harmon
74.9$174
#2Marcus Webb
72.9$166
#3Cameron Reid
69.0analytics only
#4Azan Evans
67.1$197
#5Tyson Mercer
63.5analytics only
#6Elijah Cross
60.9$95.7
#7Dink Pate
59.2$132
#8Nathan Cole
58.1analytics only
#9Andre Morrison
57.2$80.8
#10Kai Washington
56.7$74.9